|
Post by Falcons GM & Commish (Brian) on Jul 28, 2011 19:56:44 GMT -5
Maybe a compromise (if more people did want to move to 6) would be making it 1 RB 1 WR 2 Flex positions
I voted 7 for now either way though
|
|
|
Post by darren on Jul 28, 2011 19:59:00 GMT -5
ok so why not 1RB, 2WR , TE, 2 Flex, 1 QB?
This allows for teams to start 2 RB, 3 WR or 1 RB 4WRs, ot two TE or whatever gives flexability and should cover everybody's individual teams.
Just a suggestion
|
|
|
Post by Bills GM (Nate) on Jul 28, 2011 20:02:46 GMT -5
I would say Rb Wr 2flex te and qb then. I'm just against starting more then they do in real football. We would send out 32 more starters in this league then week one of the real NFL. Just not sure where those guys are gonna come from
|
|
|
Post by Falcons GM & Commish (Brian) on Jul 28, 2011 20:08:17 GMT -5
Football's not all about who's all on the field at one time though, is it? Teams that have good depth at positions are in better shape in many cases than those teams that have very strong players at all positions on the field at once but not necessarily good depth
When the Jets or Giants teams had 3 rotating RBs, they could wear a team down and none of those guys were on the field at one time.
|
|
|
Post by Texans GM (Victor) on Jul 28, 2011 20:08:53 GMT -5
I do like that last option of 1RB, 1WR, 1TE, 1QB, and 2Flex. Most teams dont have more then the 6 offensive starters that merit playing time. The 7th spot would be really dead most weeks. What ever gets most votes is cool with me. I would rather have the extra flex spot then the 2nd RB spot though.
|
|
|
Post by Falcons GM & Commish (Brian) on Jul 28, 2011 20:10:27 GMT -5
I do like that last option of 1RB, 1WR, 1TE, 1QB, and 2Flex. Most teams dont have more then the 6 offensive starters that merit playing time. The 7th spot would be really dead most weeks. What ever gets most votes is cool with me. I would rather have the extra flex spot then the 2nd RB spot though. This is pretty much exactly where I'm at too. Fine with 6 if more people want that - but like this option because it really gives all the teams the same option(s).
|
|
|
Post by 49ers GM (Alex) on Jul 28, 2011 20:17:00 GMT -5
I do like that last option of 1RB, 1WR, 1TE, 1QB, and 2Flex. Most teams dont have more then the 6 offensive starters that merit playing time. The 7th spot would be really dead most weeks. What ever gets most votes is cool with me. I would rather have the extra flex spot then the 2nd RB spot though. i agree here....... NFL Runs 6 and they seem to be doing alright.....could be 6 flexes for all i care.......but 7 is to many i think
|
|
|
Post by darren on Jul 28, 2011 20:29:15 GMT -5
I think we need to redo the poll and put in different or atleast more options.
|
|
|
Post by Falcons GM & Commish (Brian) on Jul 28, 2011 20:29:17 GMT -5
It might go without saying, but we would obviously decrease the amount of Defensive players by one also if we decrease the Offensive players.
|
|
|
Post by Bills GM (Nate) on Jul 28, 2011 20:32:04 GMT -5
It might go without saying, but we would obviously decrease the amount of Defensive players by one also if we decrease the Offensive players. Why does that matter? All d players can score points
|
|
|
Post by Bills GM (Nate) on Jul 28, 2011 20:33:10 GMT -5
I think we need to redo the poll and put in different or atleast more options. Maybe we use this one to narrow it to 6 or 7
|
|
|
Post by Falcons GM & Commish (Brian) on Jul 28, 2011 20:34:21 GMT -5
It might go without saying, but we would obviously decrease the amount of Defensive players by one also if we decrease the Offensive players. Why does that matter? All d players can score points There's no question I'm doing the same amount of defensive players as offensive players. That's not going to be up for debate
|
|
|
Post by ripdawg on Jul 28, 2011 21:19:27 GMT -5
The smaller the roster the less trading, people will fall in love with their teams and sit on them.
The more roster spots the more need to fill spots and be active!!
Don't make a critical mistake and limit the spots!
Don't we have a 35 man roster?
|
|
|
Post by Texans GM (Victor) on Jul 28, 2011 23:17:14 GMT -5
i think reducing the Defense by one is fine also.. take a DB away.. LIKE i suggested earlier ..
|
|
|
Post by Giants GM (Saul) on Jul 29, 2011 18:02:55 GMT -5
Guys, keep in mind that RBs get hurt all the time....each team can use their free agent purchases to get quality backups, and second running backs such as a 3rd down specialist. I say the more the merrier..
Saul
|
|